| why is it that the intelligent, i mean, intelligence folks are for
bush? what is it? why is it.... (hey, or maybe not. i would assume there's a liberal wing to the 'company') but let's look at it simply again you got bush and buchanan and gore and nader add that one up but only half the country even bothers to vote why is that? dumb was it.... or smart well, add it all up and what do ya got oh heard recently that the electoral vote was put together in the first place to give the southern states some measure of equality with the non-slave owners. you know, down south the slaves couldn't vote. the white folks would be under-represented the inclination at this point to simply grab the crown seems a serious mistake ah intelligence folk is it true that bush (father) got into the oil business looking after the off-shore oil wells as they were CIA freeports (where the drugs came in)? then finally a stint as director then jeb.... is it true that he headed 'illegal' contra operations in miami? now what else he did down there, i have no idea (college? other work? interests?) i would assume that the 'agency' has spent some time with 'ballots' perhaps research.... well, you might call it that. not to try and win a rant i'll stop here (but i wanta keep trying to put these pieces together) now, though, we can get back to the HARVARD-YALE game (anybody want to invest in Louis XVI?) harvard-yale... i'm talking gore-bush scores.... fight, fight, win, win.... and i would guess that the elite, rich, liberal, Democrats on the east coast are out numbered by those on the west coast at this point (though i don't have the numbers) but then again aren't there almost exactly the same number of the elite, rich, conservative, Republicans (doesn't bush have impeccable east coast credentials) they both represent the same thing.... isn't that the problem you know, the harvard-yale game mentality. (the idea of going to a football game at this point i find repellent.... whoever, wherever) we are in the middle of this game whether we like it or not. and i don't think reverse snobbery is a way to deal with it.... it's the same game and seems to have put us exactly where we are right now.... compassion? throw out 20,000 votes and then use the same ballot 2, 4 years later (was that the ballot that elected jeb?) and then just say tough.... like if you misspell missouri, or whatever there's no point reading on? winning is what it's all about? no..... and we've lived with that frame of mind for so long we in trouble now. it has allowed us to lose sight of important and serious choices that lie ahead we ought to try to create a uniforn system of voting for the nation if it's a national vote we're talking about. (and we done with slavery) and if there are questions.... do everything thing we can to solve problems patiently and thoroughly. (daley corruption is no excuse for anything.... specially now) most accurate count possible now no excuses objectively(?) if there were elections in this country today between just bush and gore.... who'd be elected? (yes.... i understand the demands of the electoral college .... remnants of the stars and bars and all) awkward indeed my impression is that a republican dominated board has called for the continued count down in florida. let's get it right... correct as best we can i understand the CIA question is complicated (the deep role it plays in our major institutions) but perhaps you saw recently the information regarding the agency's role in promoting abstract-impressionism in the '50's in order to shift the cultural domination from europe |
|
was someone talking compassion? does Bush trust the people(hand count) or the government(machines)?
|
