The arrogance and crusading zeal of the Judeo-Christian West never
ceases to amaze me. As soon as the Iraqi regime caved in, the high
priests of secularism and democracy (the media) unleashed their crusader
instincts by debating and discussing how democracy would be implemented
in Iraq. They had however forgotten to consult the most essential
component of Democracy – the people (of Iraq). For whilst they were
debating and rejoicing, at the jubilant crowds celebrating their liberation
from Saddam, their arrogance made them fail to hear what the crowds
were shouting –“La ilaha illallha” and “Allahu Akbar”. As demonstrations
against the occupiers grew, so the shouting turned into powerful calls
for Islamic government and rule “No Saddam, No USA, Yes Yes Islam”.
It was becoming clear that the Iraqi people save a few opposition
poodles in the West were not interested in democracy.
Donald Rumsfield then declared that the US would not accept Islamic
Government. He told the Iranians that the US would not accept any
interference in Iraq’s affairs from them. The sheer arrogance of these
people is amazing. These invaders of European Judeo-Christian origin,
with nothing in common with that part of the world, tell people who
share a common heritage and history that they should not interfere,
but it is okay for them to occupy and impose their values on that
nation! The “liberators” were now effectively saying that the Iraqi
people could choose any option for government, as long as that choice
was not Islam! It is not much of a democracy when you deny people
the right to make the one choice that they most desire!
At its core there is a fundamentalism within Democracy, which says
that ruling according to Man and Ruling according to God are incompatible
(Islam says the same thing). Democracy contains within it an unwritten
exclusion clause, which reads- “ The people have a right to choose
any form of government they wish, with the exception of a government
based upon Islamic rule”. An addendum to this clause reads, “in case
of the majority of the people of a nation choosing to vote for Islam,
then the only acceptable choice is secular Islam along the model of
Turkey”.
The irony of this is lost on Muslims. The West says democracy cannot
accept genuine Islamic rule, on the other hand some Muslims say Islam
(their version of it) can accept secularism and democracy. In effect
these types of Muslim have submitted to the terms, conditions and
ideology within the Judeo-Christian West. They have surrendered to
the concept of superiority of Man over God (an act of Shirk).
The idea of this unwritten clause within democracy is not just theory
but reality. Democracy has over time accepted and embraced every form
of government but an Islamic one. The case of the majority choosing
Islamic rule by popular elections in Algeria is but one case in point.
In Turkey “Islamists” proudly proclaim that they will maintain a secular
state and Islam. For the architects of democracy, Islam is more dangerous
than any other form of Government. Adolph Hitler was a democrat as
he came to power by popular mandate, so Fascism and Democracy are
compatible. Jean Marie Le Pen and other European Fascist Parties like
the British National Party and its leader Nick Griffin are acceptable
and must be allowed their democratic right to express their views
no matter how repugnant. However, when it comes to the views of a
few individual Muslims who do not have party structures or huge funds,
they are a threat to society. Muslims must not be exposed to their
views. So Abu Qatada, Sheikh Faisal and others must be locked up and
Abu Hamza deported.
Nationalism too is acceptable, as long as the people embrace it,
and most Arabs and Muslims have certainly done so. Military dictatorship
and Royalty also seem to have been particularly compatible with democracy.
The democrats seem to be able accommodate socialists and communists
too. Now that the reality of what has happened in Iraq has dawned
on the socialists, I don’t see anybody from the socialist and peace
camps defending the right of the Iraqi people to choose Islamic Government.
Many of those on the left support the Munafiqeen Khalq Organisation
in Iraq against Iran (with whom the US has just struck a deal). In
the end, the socialists are just as much determined to impose their
values on Muslims, as the Crusaders.
Democracy seems also to produce and accept racist governments. The
United States and Britain considered themselves democracies even whilst
they practised slavery against African peoples. Both these nations
accepted the racist Apartheid regime in South Africa until the very
end, and considered it democratic, as long as the whites held elections.
Religious states (non Islamic ones) are also compatible with democracy.
The Vatican state within Italy is considered quite okay, and the Zionist
apartheid state of Israel, whose very existence is based on a supposed
promise by God to the Jewish people (an argument accepted by secular
democracies and the UN!), is considered a bastion of democracy in
the Middle East. And you can be a Brahmin Hindu fundamentalist government
like that in India and be considered the biggest democracy in the
world.
Democracy it seems is very accommodating of all kinds of variations
of Government except Islamic rule. In fact democracy is mask behind
which lurks all kinds of barbarism and evil as we have just witnessed
in Iraq.
These days democracy seems to be losing its appeal in the West,
most people seem to have given up on democratic elections and politicians,
they simply don’t trust them or the system anymore. They don’t believe
democracy can deliver any meaningful change in their lives. So as
usual in the West, when something has outlived its usefulness its
time to export it to the “Third World” and Muslims. Just like the
Church of England and Christianity. With Churches empty in the West,
(except the USA) their priests now seem to spend all their effort
on missions in Africa, Latin America, and Asia (Bangladesh seems to
be a particularly popular destination).
Whilst the Muslim world was busy accepting the last lot of Western
castaway ideologies and their associated governments i.e. monarchies
and nationalist or socialist states; western democracies were moving
forward with their real hidden agenda, a global government and world
order based on their secular Judeo-Christian values – A kind of Secular
Caliphate. Whilst they were telling us about the virtues of non-violence
and non-military means for resolving political problems, they were
building the most awesome and powerful military weapons and armies
the world has ever seen. They knew only too well that military might
represent a source of power in the world without which they could
not establish their Global Government.
With this new global government comes a new religion and another
crusade against the Muslim world. But what they bring is far from
democratic. Theoretically, in a democracy, if the majority of people
believe homosexuality is acceptable, then man made laws would reflect
that. So equally, if the majority of people in a state believe that
homosexuality is unnatural, a threat to the social order, and violation
of Gods laws (as they do in African and Muslim countries), surely
the laws of those lands should reflect that? Well apparently not.
Now there is campaign at the UN to outlaw states that don’t accept
the values of the West against the wishes of their own people.
And if the majority of women in Muslim lands believe in Burkha,
Hijab and Chador, well they are not exercising their democratic rights
and freedom of religion, but are simple oppressed and brainwashed
- denied their human right to remove their clothing (its strange how
previously European colonialist that went to Africa believed that
Africans were uncivilised because many tribes wore minimal clothing
and tried to keep them clothed. The new imperialists go to these countries
and tell them they are uncivilised as they refuse to remove their
clothing like them!). This is because now, only the values of secularism
are to be considered universal, not those of God. And if the High
Priests of this new Deen of secularism are the media, then its disciples
are the Human Rights activists and agencies, who just like true crusaders,
arrogantly only consider their values as human and universally applicable.
Many Muslims have foolishly embraced this bandwagon.
So now they present this redundant democracy to the Muslim world,
and there are no shortage of takers. Many Muslims simply don’t have
the intellectual capacity or sense to recognise what is happening.
In the UK and US they naively shout, “vote”, “lobby”, “join Labour,
join the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats”. Sadly for them,
politics has entered a new global phase beyond their intellectual
and physical reach. And whilst the majority of non-Muslims in the
West are desperate for a new politics and leadership, and no longer
bother voting, Muslims are told to do just the opposite. But they
will learn the hard way.
In the Muslim world too, there are democracy dinosaurs from the
Arab world, like those on the BBC Question Time from Abu Dhabi, last
week who said “we want democracy” so many times that you would actually
believe this was a new religion (in fact although the West likes to
claim that Islam is outdated and ancient, democracy is much older,
dating to Greek and Roman times). Muslims of Arab origins are particularly
obsessed with democracy, and even talk of its compatibility with Islam.
This is partly the result of living under tyrannical regimes. They
behave like a Romeo infatuated with an attractive appearing woman,
but totally oblivious to her internal character. The more the woman
spurns his advances the more infatuated the Romeo becomes. Equally
the more democracy is denied them in their lands the more they desire
it.
Now the crusaders bring them a gift of what they desire, a beautiful
Burkha clad democracy. Previously, wherever the European colonialists
went to conquer they brought gifts. To the Red Indians they brought
smallpox infected blankets. To the Indians they supposedly brought
trade. To the Africans they brought Christianity. The Crusader States
of the colonial period sent their Christian Missionaries first, and
their armies afterwards. An old African saying rings true “when the
Christian missionaries came to us, they put the Bible in front of
us and said this is the path to your salvation. But to be near to
God you have to close your eyes. And whilst we were trying to reach
God through the bible with our eyes closed, they robbed us. When we
opened our eyes they had taken everything we had”. Muslims need to
be wary of these new gifts from European Judeo-Christian Crusaders
Now they are up to their old tricks again, only this time they present
democracy as our salvation. To reach this goal you have to vote and
have elections, and set up representative governments and bodies.
You have to join the “world community” and work through the family
of the United Nations. And whilst we are busy doing this with our
eyes closed, wasting our time and energy in pursuit of another false
God, they are robbing us and crusading against us, and imposing their
ways on us. By the time we open our eyes they will have reached Mecca
and Medina.
But remove the mask from democracy and you see the same ingredients
of previous crusaders - brute imperialism, colonialism, loot, plunder,
murder and pillage. Behind the scenes lurk the spectre of Christianity
and Zionism in partnership with a secular this worldly power, (only
this time the crusader states send their armies to invade first and
then send in the missionaries afterwards). Beneath the false mask
of democracy are the universal values that come with it, illegitimate
leaders and rule, godlessness, adultery, fornication, pornography,
alcoholism, homosexuality, usury and unfettered greed. The same European
Crusaders are bringing their same old ideas and values. These Crusaders
like their predecessors are so utterly arrogant and convinced of the
superiority of their ways, and their military power, that they will
stop at nothing to impose them on Muslims. Sadly Muslims have fallen
into the trap of attempting to reason with this arrogant civilisation,
instead of following the clear instructions of the Qur'aan. You see
the result of these debates in the media. Muslims that have mentally
accepted the superiority of democracy and its universal values, then
apologetically try to convince the world that Islam is just as modern
and civilised and can live up to their standards. The Qur'aan tells
us that arrogance is incapable of being reasoned with; it makes them
“deaf, dumb and blind”. It is simply enough to say to them what we
are instructed to do so in this beautiful verse of the Qur'aan by
Allah (swt).
Say: (Oh Muhammad to these Mushrikun and Kafirun) “Oh Al- Kafirun,
I worship not that which you worship. Nor will you worship that which
I worship. And I shall not worship that which you are worshipping.
Nor will you worship that which I am worshipping. To you be your Deen
and to me my Deen” (Sura Al Kafirun).
Muslims do not want your democracy, or your values, nor do you want
what we want - Gods rule or his values. To you be your ways, and to
us ours. And if you do not leave Muslims alone, and as long as you
continue to Crusade against them and their lands, to enforce your
ways, then there will inevitably be Jihad against you.
